[release] v0.104.1#4729
Conversation
chat_v0 returned the raw LiteLLM message, leaking provider-specific fields
(provider_specific_fields, annotations) into outputs. Validate through the SDK
Message model so the output is the canonical {role, content, name, tool_calls,
tool_call_id}, matching what a hook/custom workflow returns.
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
… better UX fix(SessionsTable): share page store to resolve session data correctly in table cells
The API-key creation success popup rendered the full key in a flex row without any break rule. A real key is an 8-char prefix plus a 64-char hex secret (one '.' separator), so the unbreakable hex tail forced the flex item past its container and the key overflowed the modal edge. Let the key wrap within the available width and keep the copy icon pinned beside it: - key span: min-w-0 + break-all so it can shrink and break mid-token - icon span: shrink-0 so it is never squeezed out - row: items-start so the icon aligns to the first line when wrapping Fixes #4645
get_default_workspace_id no longer prefers owner-role (multi-org: an invitee owns their own empty personal workspace). Update the stale test to assert the oldest membership wins regardless of role. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
[fix] Resolve failing API test
Railway Preview Environment
Updated at 2026-06-22T12:31:55.687Z |
fix(frontend): cap sidebar banner queue
Fix: Observability session data display issue
[fix] Normalize chat workflow output to the canonical Message shape
…block [fix]: code evaluator code editor issues
…onstraint fix(hosting): scope gh.local traefik to its own compose project
[fix] Self-heal Playwright browser cache
…-service [fix] Select Railway services when redeploying previews
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 9a8869b609
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| providers: | ||
| docker: {} | ||
| docker: | ||
| constraints: "Label(`com.docker.compose.project`,`agenta-gh-ssl`)" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Honor custom compose project names in SSL Traefik
When the SSL stack is started with a custom COMPOSE_PROJECT_NAME/-p to run an isolated copy, Compose labels the app containers with that custom project name, but this Traefik constraint only watches agenta-gh-ssl. In that context Traefik filters out the web/api/service router labels and the HTTPS stack comes up without routes; the non-SSL compose files handle this by interpolating the project name, so the SSL path needs the same treatment or the constraint should be omitted there.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
…dal-overflow [4645] fix(frontend): wrap API key inside the create-key modal
…cit-redeploy-service Revert "[fix] Select Railway services when redeploying previews"
New version v0.104.1 in